Postexercise cardiovascular hemodynamics assessment before and after a 30-minute standing still recovery.

BACKGROUND: Although postexercise syncope usually occurs shortly after physical exercise conclusion, athletes commonly reveal symptoms of postexercise hypotension several tens of minutes after exercise completion. Currently, no studies have investigated central hemodynamic regulation during posture changes occurring several tens of minutes after exercise compared to immediately after cessation. METHODS: This study examined changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), systemic vascular conductance (SVC), cardiac output, and stroke volume during two sets of tilt tests performed before vs. after a 30-minute standing still recovery, respectively. Tilt tests were performed after a short-lasting supramaximal test (WNG) and long-lasting maximal incremental test (INC) in 12 young endurance-trained individuals. RESULTS: The key findings were that, regardless of the exercise type, the 30-minute recovery augmented (P<0.01) the increase in HR and the drop in SVC during the transition from supine to upright, although the MAP drop was similar (P=0.99) after vs. before recovery. INC led to greater increases (P<0.01) in HR and drops (P<0.01) in SVC compared to WNG during postural transitions both before and after the recovery. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that, in a population that tolerates postexercise hypotension, MAP neural control is more challenged after a 30-minute standing still recovery than before, as evidenced by an augmented vasodilation capacity along with an increased HR buffering response during posture changes. Moreover, our data suggest that effective MAP control is resulting from an equally effective HR buffering response on MAP. Therefore, exercises that induce greater systemic vasodilation lead to greater HR buffering responses.

Circadian and sex differences in post-ischemic vasodilation and reactive hyperemia in young individuals and elderly with and without type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular events show morning preference and sex differences, and are related to aging and type 2 diabetes. We assessed circadian variations and sex differences in vascular conductance (VC) and blood flow (BF) regulations following a brief bout of forearm ischemia. METHODS: Young healthy individuals (H18-30) and elderly without (H50-80) and with type 2 diabetes (T2DM50-80) of both sexes were included. Forearm VC and BF, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at baseline and following circulatory reperfusion were measured at 6 a.m. and 9 p.m. RESULTS: In the morning compared to evening, following reperfusion, the VC and BF increments were similar in H18-30 (p>.71), but lower in H50-80 (p<.001) and T2DM50-80 (p<.01). VC and BF following circulatory reperfusion were higher in men than women in H18-30 (p<.001), but similar between sexes in the older groups (p>.23). CONCLUSIONS: Forearm vasodilation following reperfusion is attenuated in the morning in the elderly, impairing BF towards an ischemic area. Diabetes does not affect the circadian regulation of VC and BF, but that of MAP. There are sex differences in VC and BF at baseline and after circulatory reperfusion at a young age, being greater in men, which disappear with aging without being affected by diabetes.

Mental stress augments central artery stiffness in young individuals of both sexes.

Mental stress is a daily stimulus that can acutely activate the sympathetic nervous system. Whether sympathetic stimulation can augment central artery stiffness (CAS) has not yet been well documented. Moreover, sex differences in sympathetic neurovascular transduction have been reported. We assessed whether mental stress augments CAS in both sexes and whether any CAS increase is blunted in women compared with men. The hf-PWV (heart-femoral pulse wave velocity; index of CAS), MAP (mean arterial pressure), PP (pulse pressure), TPR (total peripheral resistance), and HR (heart rate) were measured in 26 young individuals (13 men, 13 women) at rest and throughout a 10-minute bout of stress induced by mental arithmetic. Data over the mental stress period were compared to the preceding baseline values and between sexes. Mental stress increased hf-PWV, MAP, PP, and HR from baseline throughout the entire stimulation period (p < .005). TPR diminished in the first minute of stimulation (p < .001) in both sexes and increased in the last minutes in women only (p < .005). Hf-PWV was lower in women than men (p < .001) at rest and during mental stress, but the changes from baseline were similar in both sexes. There were sex differences in the PP and TPR changes, which were evident at different times of stimulation. Mental stress increased CAS in both sexes throughout the stimulation period. Although values of CAS were lower in women both at rest and during mental stress, the CAS increase due to mental stress was similar in both sexes.

Circadian Variations in Sympathetic Vasoconstriction in Older Adults with and Without Type 2 Diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: An impact of the sympathetic nervous system in the higher rate of cardiovascular events in the early morning compared to the evening has been claimed. Augmented sympathetic vasoconstriction increases cardiovascular risk by augmenting pulse pressure and cardiac afterload. Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) further increases sympathetic neurovascular transduction and cardiovascular risk. AIM: We assessed whether peripheral vasoconstriction triggered by a standardized sympathetic stressor is augmented at 6am vs 9pm in adults between 50-80 years with type 2 diabetes (T2DM50-80) vs healthy ones (H50-80). METHODS: Mean values of sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness (SVR), vascular conductance (VC), brachial artery blood flow, and mean arterial pressure were measured on the contralateral forearm over two 5-minute bouts of rest and handgrip-mediated sympathetic stimulation, respectively. RESULTS: Although baseline VC values were lower (p < 0.01) in the morning vs evening in both groups, SVR values in response to sympathoexcitation were similar in H50-80 (- 0.43 ± 12.44 vs - 2.57 ± 11.63 %, p = 0.73) and T2DM50-80 (+6.64 ± 10.67 vs +5.21 ± 7.64 %, p = 0.90), but higher (p < 0.01) in T2DM50-80 vs H50-80 at both day hours. Individuals with T2DM reported positive SVR values and VC change-scores, while healthy individuals reported statistically different (p < 0.02) negative SVR values and VC change-scores. CONCLUSION: Peripheral vasoconstriction triggered by a standardized sympathetic stressor is similar between morning and evening, regardless of T2DM and different baseline VC values. However, peripheral vasoconstriction responsiveness is blunted in individuals with T2DM as handgrip-mediated sympathoexcitation induces vasodilation in the contralateral forearm in adults with T2DM and vasoconstriction in healthy age-matched controls, highlighting a neurovascular response altered by T2DM.

Circadian and sex differences in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in young individuals and elderly with and without type 2 diabetes.

The incidence of cardiovascular events is higher in the morning than in the evening and differs between sexes. We tested the hypothesis that aortic stiffness, a compelling cardiovascular risk factor, increases in the morning than in the evening in young, healthy individuals between 18 and 30 years (H18-30) or in older individuals between 50 and 80 years, either healthy (H50-80) or with type 2 diabetes (T2DM50-80). Sex differences were also investigated. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) recorded via Doppler Ultrasound, blood pressure and heart rate were checked at 6 a.m. and 9 p.m., at rest and during acute sympathetic activation triggered by handgrip exercise. Cf-PWV values were lower in the morning compared to the evening in all groups (p < 0.01) at rest and lower (p = 0.008) in H18-30 but similar (p > 0.267) in the older groups during sympathetic activation. At rest, cf-PWV values were lower in young women compared to young men (p = 0.001); however, this trend was reversed in the older groups (p < 0.04). During sympathetic activation, the cf-PWV was lower in women in H18-30 (p = 0.001), similar between sexes in H50-80 (p = 0.122), and higher in women in T2DM50-80 (p = 0.004). These data do not support the hypothesis that aortic stiffness increases in the morning compared to the evening within any of the considered groups in both rest and sympathetic activation conditions. There are differences between the sexes, which vary according to age and diabetes status. In particular, aortic stiffness is higher in older women than in men with diabetes during acute stress.

Estimation of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity from finger photoplethysmography signal.

Objective. This project compared a new method to estimate the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) to the gold-standard cf-PWV technique.Approach. The cf-PWV was estimated from the pulse transit time (FPS-PTT) calculated by processing the finger photoplethysmographic signal of Finapres (FPS) and subject's height only (brief mode) as well as along with other variables (age, heart rate, arterial pressure, weight; complete mode). Doppler ultrasound cf-PWVs and FPS-PTTs were measured in 90 participants equally divided into 3 groups (18-30; 31-59; 60-79 years). Predictions were performed using multiple linear regressions (MLR) and with the best regression model identified by using MATLAB Regression Learner App. A validation set approach (60 training datasets, 30 testing datasets; VSA) and leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) were used.Main results. With MLR, the discrepancies were: 0.01 ± 1.21 m s-1(VSA) and 0.001 ± 1.11 m s-1(LOOCV) in brief mode; -0.02 ± 0.83 m s-1(VSA) and 0.001 ± 0.84 m s-1(LOOCV) in complete mode. Using a linear support vector machine model (SVM) in brief mode, the discrepancies were: 0.01 ± 1.19 m s-1(VSA) and -0.01 ± 1.06 m s-1(LOOCV). Using an Exponential Gaussian process regression model (GPR) in complete mode, the discrepancies were: -0.03 ± 0.79 m s-1(VSA) and 0.01 ± 0.75 m s-1(LOOCV).Significance. The cf-PWV can be estimated by processing the FPS-PTT and subjects' height only, but the inclusion of other variables improves the prediction performance. Predictions through MLR qualify as acceptable in both brief and complete modes. Predictions via linear SVM in brief mode improve but still qualify as acceptable. Interestingly, predictions through Exponential GPR in complete mode improve and qualify as excellent.

Sympathetic-mediated blunting of forearm vasodilation is similar between young men and women.

BACKGROUND: The in-vivo regulation of vascular conductance (VC) is a continuous balance between endothelial vasodilation and sympathetic vasoconstriction. Although women may report blunted sympathetic vasoconstriction along with higher endothelial vasodilation than men, it is currently unknown whether the interaction between vasoconstriction and vasodilation leads to different regulation of VC between sexes. This study assessed sex differences in sympathetic-mediated blunting of endothelial vasodilation after a brief period of ischemia and whether any restriction of vasodilation blunts tissue blood flow (BF) and re-oxygenation. METHODS: 13 young women and 12 young men underwent two 5-min forearm circulatory occlusions followed by reperfusion, one in basal conditions and the other during cold pressor test-induced sympathetic activation (SYMP). Brachial artery diameter and BF, mean arterial pressure, total peripheral resistance (TPR), and thenar eminence oxygenation were collected. Percent changes normalized to baseline values of forearm VC, brachial artery BF and flow-mediated dilation (FMD), TPR, and hand oxygenation after circulatory reperfusion were calculated. RESULTS: TPR increased during SYMP in men (p = 0.019) but not in women (p = 0.967). Women showed a greater brachial artery FMD than men (p = 0.004) at rest, but sex differences disappeared after normalization to shear rate and baseline diameter (p > 0.11). The percent increases from baseline of peak and average forearm VC after circulatory reperfusion did not differ between sexes in basal conditions (p > 0.98) or during SYMP (p > 0.97), and were restrained by SYMP similarly in both sexes (p < 0.003) without impairing the hand re-oxygenation (p > 0.08) or average hyperemic response (p > 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Although women may report blunted sympathetic vasoconstriction than men when assessed separately, the similar sympathetic-mediated restriction of vasodilation suggests a similar dynamic regulation of VC between sexes. SYMP-mediated restrictions of the normal forearm vasodilation do not impair the average hyperemic response and hand re-oxygenation in both sexes.

Post-exercise upside-down recovery does accelerate the heart rate recovery but does not improve subsequent sprint performance.

BACKGROUND: Many recreational cyclists believe that lying upside-down after intense physical exertion speeds up physical recovery, enhancing subsequent exercise performance. However, the effectiveness of this technique has not yet been investigated. METHODS: Twenty-five active cyclists (10 females/15 males; age 23.3±3.8 years old) performed a supramaximal 45-sec Wingate Test before and after a 7-minute recovery period at +45° or -20° of inclination, randomly, in a two-day cross-over protocol. The percentage decline of post- compared to prerecovery Wingate performance was used to assess the recovery effectiveness. Kinetics of lactate, heart rate (HR), and mean blood pressure (MBP) during recovery were considered as physiological indices of recovery. RESULTS: Seven subjects (5 males) did not complete the +45° protocol due to presyncopal symptoms. The upside-down compared to the standing recovery did not change the subsequent Wingate performance, despite faster HR decline and cyclists' perception of better recovery. The upside-down recovery did not change the kinetics of lactate clearance but prevented the MBP fall. CONCLUSIONS: Among subjects who fully completed the protocol, our data reveal the ineffectiveness of the upside-down recovery to enhance subsequent exercise performance, despite the faster HR decline and personal feeling of greater recovery may suggest that assumption. Such a better psychophysical feeling when upside-down compared to standing recovery may be associated with attenuation of postexercise hypotension symptoms. This data suggest being cautious in basing the assessment of the athlete's recovery exclusively on the postexercise kinetics of the HR.

Effect of acute sympathetic activation on leg vasodilation before and after endurance exercise.

Vascular conductance (VC) regulation involves a continuous balance between metabolic vasodilation and sympathetic vasoconstriction. Endurance exercise challenges the sympathetic control on VC due to attenuated sympathetic receptor responsiveness and persistence of muscle vasodilation, especially in endurance athletes, predisposing them to blood pressure control dysfunctions. This study assessed whether acute handgrip-mediated sympathetic activation (SYMP) restrains sudden leg vasodilation before and after a half-marathon. Prior to, and within the 20 min following the race, 11 well-trained runners underwent two single passive leg movement (SPLM) tests to suddenly induce leg vasodilation, one without and the other during SYMP. Leg blood flow and mean arterial pressure were measured to assess changes in leg VC. Undertaking 60 sec of SYMP reduced the baseline leg VC both before (4.0 ± 1.0 vs. 3.3 ± 0.7 ml/min/mmHg; P=0.01; NO SYMP vs. SYMP, respectively) and after the race (4.6 ± 0.8 vs. 3.9 ± 0.8 ml/min/mmHg; P=0.01). However, SYMP did not reduce leg peak vasodilation immediately after the SPLM either before (11.5 ± 4.0 vs. 12.2 ± 3.8 ml/min/mmHg; P=0.35) or after the race (7.2 ± 2.0 vs. 7.3 ± 2.6 ml/min/mmHg; P=0.96). Furthermore, SYMP did not blunt the mean leg vasodilation over the 60 sec after the SPLM before (5.1 ± 1.7 vs. 5.9 ± 2.5 ml/min/mmHg; P=0.14) or after the race (4.8 ± 1.3 vs. 4.2 ± 1.5 ml/min/mmHg; P=0.26). This data suggest that the release of local vasoactive agents effectively opposes any preceding handgrip-mediated augmented vasoconstriction in endurance athletes before and after a half-marathon. Handgrip-mediated SYMP might improve normal vasoconstriction while athletes are still, but not necessarily while they move, as movements can induce a release of vasoactive molecules.